2008: 90-72 (1st NL East, World Series Champions)
The 2008 Philadelphia Phillies were a very good team that got hot at the right time (September and October) and generally did this because the offense was good, the bench produced, and the pitching staff – especially the bullpen – was flat out impressive.
In the National League, only one team scored more runs (the Chicago Cubs), and only two teams allowed fewer runs (The Cubs and the Los Angeles Dodgers), which helps to explain why only the Cubs had the better regular season record. However, the Cubs folded the tent in October while the Phillies were just getting started. If the Phillies needed to score runs, they could. If the team needed a solid pitching performance, especially down the stretch, it could get one, and if the bullpen needed to hold a lead, Brad Lidge and company could stop another team cold in its tracks. It didn’t hurt that down the stretch the Phillies played a lot of games against the weak sisters (Atlanta, Washington, and the folding Mets), but even when faced with a playoff bound Milwaukee in September, the Phillies smoked them in four straight – which should have sounded the alarm that this team was ready for the playoffs.
And they were ready. They took down the Brewers, they stopped the charging Dodgers, and they blew away a very good Tampa Bay Rays team winning every home game and losing just once on the road in each series.
Looking Back on 2008
As in 2007, the getaway was problematic but not as bad. For 20 games, Philadelphia would win two and lose two, never falling more than two games under .500, but never getting past it, either. Then, in game 23, the Phillies got above even and started making progress toward the top of the division.
The reason for this was that half the starting rotation was working, and half the offense was working. Cole Hamels and Jamie Moyer were great, Brett Myers and Adam Eaton were struggling, and Kyle Kendrick was somewhere in the middle. And, Ryan Howard got off to such a slow start it negated the amazing start of Chase Utley. Pat Burrell was hitting, but Jimmy Rollins was fighting nagging injuries and not hitting.
In late May, the pieces started coming together. Over the summer, Charlie Manual and the rest of Phillie management convinced Brett Myers to take a month in the minors to work on a couple of adjustments and see if he couldn’t get things turned around. Myers, to his credit, did just that and when he came back in August was solid down the stretch. Then, the Phillies finally gave up on Adam Eaton and traded for Joe Blanton, giving up a couple of minor leaguers. Blanton, who had struggled some in Oakland, found his stride down the stretch and looked even more confident in the post-season. So, by the time September rolled around, the rotation featured four solid starters and Kyle Kendrick – who wasn’t pitching well, but still had a winning record. The Phillies had their best month in September, winning seventeen games while losing just eight. In October, they were even better.
Tell me about that offense
Believe it or not, as good as the 2008 Phillies line up was, they were almost 100 runs worse than in 2007.
Some of this could have been predicted (and was). Jimmy Rollins was coming off his best season ever, so to think he would generate 140 runs of offense again would have been extremely optimistic. Struggling through the year, Rollins still produced, but was 45 runs worse than the previous year. He missed 35 games, lost 100 points in his slugging percentage, and it showed up on the scoreboard. His backup, usually Eric Bruntlett, can’t hit like Rollins. Shane Victorino moved to center to replace Aaron Rowand, who was coming off his career best season. Victorino was good, but still 25 runs behind what Rowand produced.
Some of the rest was just the give and take of seasons. Ryan Howard was slow to get rolling and was off slightly from the previous year. Pedro Feliz looked slow at the plate and was below average in hitting. Catcher Carlos Ruiz struggled, giving more time to Chris Coste, who hit pretty well. Chase Utley and Pat Burrell were no better than they had been in 2007 – which is to say they remained potent hitters.
However, top to bottom, this was a solid line up. You had six above average bats (Rollins, Utley, Howard, Burrell, Victorino, and Werth), and a couple of slower bats – but it worked. No team is going to complain about finishing in second in runs scored. The Phillies could hit.
The Phillies were slightly above average in terms of turning balls in play into outs. The outfield improved in part because Victorino and Werth were an improvement on Rowand in center, Pat Burrell had a slightly better year than in 2007 defensively (still bad though), and the backups in the outfield (Werth when he played in center, Taguchi when he played in left) caught everything.
Jimmy Rollins has below average range (-4.1, the third straight year between -4 and -5), but makes up for it on the double play and avoiding errors. Chase Utley has above average range and is also good turning two. The Phillies were slightly above average in the percentage of baserunners removed by double plays. Howard appears to be losing his mobility. The few replacements at first base all had better per inning numbers, but nobody is taking Howard off the diamond. Pedro Feliz was slightly below average but even his replacement was solid (Dobbs).
The outfield was weak. Victorino and Werth were, on the whole, average. The now departed Burrell has wrestled with Josh Willingham for two years to see who was the worst defensive left fielder in the National League. The backups, So Taguchi and Geoff Jenkins, were both solid defensively.
Behind the plate, Ruiz and Coste are tolerable. Both were below average against the stolen base and the total number of steals allowed was the fifth most in the league. Coste makes fewer mistakes, but Ruiz appears to be more mobile in that he had 28 more assists that were not people trying to steal bases than Cost in a similar number of innings.
Last year I wrote, “Cole Hamels was brilliant, winning 15 of 20 decisions and with an ERA of 3.39 in a difficult park. He continued to strike out nearly a batter an inning and cut his walk rate down to just 43 in more than 180 innings of work…. Hamels might be able to pick up 40 more innings…” I’ll just quote that part, since it was right on the money, and not note that I had predicted Jamie Moyer to decline, when Moyer was equally brilliant in 2008. Hamels saved his team 30 runs over the average pitcher, Moyer another 20.
Blanton was a slightly above average pitcher after his arrival, and Brett Myers was break even – with his second half being as good as his first half was poor. So, the top four starters, who all return in 2009, were above average.
After that, you have Kyle Kendrick. In two seasons, Kendrick has had a winning record – but things are going in the wrong direction. He doesn’t strike anyone out and he doesn’t walk people. In 2007, the ball stayed in the park. In 2008, the ball left the yard. When a pitcher allows too many hitters to put the ball in play, it’s a bad combination that is bound to backfire. In 2008 it did. Adam Eaton is still around, but for the third straight year, he posted an ERA over 5.00. I would be surprised if Eaton is on the roster in 2008.
The bullpen, however, showed incredible improvement. Brad Lidge didn’t blow a single save and was absolutely amazing all season long. And – he wasn’t alone. Ryan Madson, J.C. Romero, Clay Condrey, and Chad Durbin all were 10 runs allowed better than the average reliever. Scott Eyre came over from the Cubs and was above average as well. I mean – every pitcher who played a key role on the team, with the exception of Adam Eaton, was above average. That’s TEN solid pitchers.
Conventional wisdom might look at this team and say “wow – look how good they were, this is the team to beat in the NL” – and for the most part conventional wisdom is right. Unfortunately, there are a few “buts” to consider.
Last year, the team was virtually injury free. Jimmy Rollins was the only starter to miss any significant time, and he still played in nearly 140 games. No pitcher went down with a serious injury, except Tom Gordon, who wasn’t needed and was the last active pitcher who played with Frank White. I’d be hard pressed to believe that the same luck will stay with the Phillies in 2009. Chase Utley had hip surgery in the offseason and the Phillies are cautiously optimistic that he’ll be back around opening day. As such, Marcus Giles was given a Non-Roster Invite to spring training – and he hasn’t been good since 2006.
The 2008 Phillies were a veteran team. Not an old team, but a collection of guys around 29 on offense, and – Moyer not withstanding – generally prime ages for pitchers. That works in their favor – but they aren’t getting younger either. Replacing Burrell in left field will be the 37 year-old Raul Ibanez. Raul’s slightly better in the field than Burrell, and hasn’t missed much time in the last seven years. But he’s 37 – and guys who are 37 miss games. They don’t get faster. Ibanez isn’t likely to be better than Burrell, he’s likely to be worse.
J.C Romero tested positive for performance enhancing drugs, moving Scott Eyre into a more prominent role, but Romero’s roster spot was claimed by Chan Ho Park. Park turns 36 in mid-season. Park won’t be better than Romero, that’s for sure. And, God help the Phillies if they need him to be a starter – he hasn’t been effective in that role for years. Outfielder Tai Iguchi is gone; the remaining backup outfielders are Jenkins (34) and Matt Stairs (40). John Mayberry, Jr., acquired from Texas, hasn’t played in the majors yet and has never hit above .270 in the minors. And, like a lot of young major leaguers, he strikes out a lot.
Let’s try to do this by runs. My guess is that Ibanez will be 10 – 15 runs worse than Burrell, Feliz will continue to look older, and Greg Dobbs may not be as consistent. If it were me, I’d play Dobbs over Feliz, but I don’t think Manual agrees with me. Anyway – that’s another ten run loss. Ryan Howard isn’t getting better – just richer. He could be off five runs from last year. Utley is a question mark. I root for the guy, personally, but it could be a 30 – 40 run decline from 2008. There could be a slight improvement at catcher, Ronnie Paulino was acquired from Pittsburgh as insurance, but he’s not better than either Ruiz or Coste. There is no position where the Phillies will be BETTER on offense. More likely, the Phillies will fall from nearly 800 runs to 750 runs offensively. It could be less than that.
Defensively, the team will likely be flat – depending on how well Utley’s replacement plays. Giles won’t be better than Utley, though the improvement of not playing Burrell for 1000 innings in the outfield will make up for that in some way.
So that leaves the pitching staff. Let’s say Hamels remains outstanding, and Blanton and Myers are above average. It’s equally likely however that whatever benefits Blanton and Myers may add will be negated by a decline by Moyer. Moyer’s season in 2008 was the lone solid season in the last four – and while he’s one of my favorite pitchers, he’s not going to be better than last year. I think he could easily be 20 runs worse than last year – which makes Moyer league average. Moyer’s record will be 10 – 12 if he makes 30 starts again. He usually does…
If I’m Charlie Manual, I give starts to J.A. Happ. Happ looks to be an improvement over Kyle Kendrick – he’s been solid in the minors and didn’t disappoint in four starts last year. That would be his only chance to improve the rotation. At least Manual has a good sixth option. Park is not. Eaton should be released. A full year of Blanton is an improvement over 13 starts of Blanton and 19 starts by Eaton.
However, so many pitchers were above average in the bullpen, I’d fear for at least one of them (Clay Condrey is my first guess, Park the other) to be league average or worse. That’s another decline of at least 20 runs. On the whole, the pitchers are likely to allow 35 more runs than in 2008. That puts the runs scored/runs allowed numbers at 750/700 – a record of about 87 – 75. 87 wins might be enough to make the playoffs, though – and since this team has two straight years of closing strongly, I wouldn’t be surprised if they sneak in by a nose. One pitcher injury, however – especially if it’s Hamels – would cost the team five games in the standings, and 82 wins won’t get it done.
Down on the Farm…
The Lehigh Valley IronPigs look to be shy on players who can help. The best hitter is probably first baseman Adam Tracy – but he isn’t great and Howard isn’t moving. Mike Cervanek looks like Enos Cabell – might hit .280 with 10 homers and no walks. Outfielder Brendan Watson isn’t going to help people if he hits .270 with no power and a bad stolen base percentage. Their catching prospect, Jason Jaramillo was sent to Pittsburgh for Ronny Paulino. The best pitcher was J.A. Happ, who should be starting for Philadelphia already. He just needs a chance to pitch 140 innings and show what he can do and learn how to survive at the top level.
The best hitter in Reading (AA) was catcher Lou Marson, who got to play in one September game and homered for the Phillies that day. I thought he looked good at Clearwater in 2007, so his continued improvement bodes well for his future. He’ll be starting here by 2010. Jason Donald looked good at shortstop, hitting for power and showing plate discipline. He’s blocked at the big league level, though, unless Utley can’t come back. Jeremy Slayden can hit some, but he’ll be 27 soon and running out of time. He’s reaching his peak and hasn’t gotten past AA. No pitchers in AA were that impressive – nobody with stunning strikeout numbers, a low number of hits per nine, or remarkable control.
At the lower levels, Michael Taylor hit a ton at Lakeland and Clearwater, but few others had successful runs. Taylor comes from Stanford and is built like a tight end (6’ 6”, 250) but needs to move up a couple of levels quickly. This was his first solid season in the minors.